Current:Home > MarketsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Capitatum
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
FinLogic FinLogic Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-06 05:56:53
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (6)
Related
- New Orleans mayor’s former bodyguard making first court appearance after July indictment
- Jurors in New Mexico deliver split verdicts in kidnapping and terrorism case
- Ukraine uses U.S.-supplied long-range ATACMS missiles for first time in counteroffensive against Russia
- Oklahoma school bus driver faces kidnapping charges after refusing to let students leave
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Koolaburra by UGG Sale: Keep Your Toes Toasty With Up to 55% Off on Boots, Slippers & More
- Here are the most popular Halloween costumes of 2023, according to Google
- Mayor denies discussing absentee ballots with campaign volunteer at center of ballot stuffing claims
- 'Most Whopper
- Indiana teacher who went missing in Puerto Rico presumed dead after body found
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Major U.S. science group lays out a path to smooth the energy transtion
- Four killed in multicar crash on Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu
- Instead of coming face-to-face with Michael Cohen, Trump confronts emails and spreadsheets at New York trial
- Organizers cancel Taylor Swift concerts in Vienna over fears of an attack
- Taco Bell is the quickest fast-food drive-thru experience, study finds. Here's where the others rank.
- Colorado teens accused of taking ‘memento’ photo after rock-throwing death set to appear in court
- Arkansas orders Chinese company’s subsidiary to divest itself of agricultural land
Recommendation
What to watch: O Jolie night
University of Wisconsin leaders to close 2 more branch campuses due to declining enrollment
Nikki Haley nabs fundraiser from GOP donor who previously supported DeSantis: Sources
Greta Thunberg charged with public order offense in UK after arrest outside oil industry conference
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
Proposals would end Pennsylvania’s closed primary system by opening it up to unaffiliated voters
The NHL had a chance to be decent. And then it missed a wide-open net.
What’s changed — and what hasn’t — a year after Mississippi capital’s water crisis?