Current:Home > FinanceJury in NFL "Sunday Ticket" case rules league violated antitrust laws, awards nearly $4.8 billion in damages -Capitatum
Jury in NFL "Sunday Ticket" case rules league violated antitrust laws, awards nearly $4.8 billion in damages
FinLogic FinLogic Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-09 06:30:38
A jury in U.S. District Court ordered the NFL to pay nearly $4.8 billion in damages Thursday after ruling that the league violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.
The jury awarded $4.7 billion in damages to the residential class and $96 million in damages to the commercial class.
The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses who paid for the package of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons on DirecTV. The lawsuit claimed the league broke antitrust laws by selling its package of Sunday games at an inflated price. The subscribers also say the league restricted competition by offering "Sunday Ticket" only on a satellite provider.
The NFL said it would appeal the verdict. That appeal would go to the 9th Circuit and then possibly the Supreme Court.
"We are disappointed with the jury's verdict today in the NFL Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit," the league said in a statement. "We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy, which features all NFL games broadcast on free over-the-air television in the markets of the participating teams and national distribution of our most popular games, supplemented by many additional choices including RedZone, Sunday Ticket and NFL+, is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.
"We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit."
The jury of five men and three women deliberated for nearly five hours before reaching its decision.
"This case transcends football. This case matters," plaintiffs attorney Bill Carmody said during Wednesday's closing arguments. "It's about justice. It's about telling the 32 team owners who collectively own all the big TV rights, the most popular content in the history of TV - that's what they have. It's about telling them that even you cannot ignore the antitrust laws. Even you cannot collude to overcharge consumers. Even you can't hide the truth and think you're going to get away with it."
The league maintained it has the right to sell "Sunday Ticket" under its antitrust exemption for broadcasting. The plaintiffs say that only covers over-the-air broadcasts and not pay TV.
DirecTV had "Sunday Ticket" from its inception in 1994 through 2022. The league signed a seven-year deal with Google's YouTube TV that began with the 2023 season.
The lawsuit was originally filed in 2015 by the Mucky Duck sports bar in San Francisco but was dismissed in 2017. Two years later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over California and eight other states, reinstated the case. Gutierrez ruled last year the case could proceed as a class action.
- In:
- NFL
veryGood! (541)
Related
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Jenna Ortega's 2023 Emmys Look Proves Her Wednesday-Inspired Style Is Over
- Tanzania blocks Kenyan Airways passenger flights in response to Kenya blocking its cargo flights
- Colombia extends cease-fire with FARC splinter group in bid to reduce rural violence
- New Orleans mayor’s former bodyguard making first court appearance after July indictment
- China blasts president of the Philippines for congratulating Taiwan election winner
- Nearly 7,000 people without power in Las Vegas Valley as of Monday afternoon
- Guinness World Records suspends ‘oldest dog ever’ title for Portuguese canine during a review
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Airlines scrap thousands of flights as wintry weather disrupts travel
Ranking
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- The second trial between Donald Trump and E. Jean Carroll is underway. Here's what to know.
- 150M under weather alerts, 6 dead as 'dangerous cold' has US in its clutches: Live updates
- A surgeon general report once cleared the air about smoking. Is it time for one on vaping?
- Michigan lawmaker who was arrested in June loses reelection bid in Republican primary
- Toledo officers shoot, kill suspect in homicide of woman after pursuit, police say
- On tap in 2024: More Modelo, tequila, canned cocktails, whiskey and non-boozy beverages
- New mud volcanoes discovered in Caribbean island of Trinidad after small eruption
Recommendation
Bet365 ordered to refund $519K to customers who it paid less than they were entitled on sports bets
Emmys 2023: Jenna Ortega's Wednesday Season 2 Update Will Send Shivers Down Your Spine
Trump leads GOP rightward march and other takeaways from the Iowa caucuses
What does FICA mean? Here's how much you contribute to federal payroll taxes.
Vance jokes he’s checking out his future VP plane while overlapping with Harris at Wisconsin airport
China's millennial and Gen Z workers are having to lower their economic expectations
The Excerpt podcast: US strikes at Houthis again
Toledo officers shoot, kill suspect in homicide of woman after pursuit, police say