Current:Home > InvestNew rule aims to speed up removal of limited group of migrants who don’t qualify for asylum -Capitatum
New rule aims to speed up removal of limited group of migrants who don’t qualify for asylum
View
Date:2025-04-13 06:41:26
WASHINGTON (AP) — A new Biden administration rule announced Thursday aims to speed up asylum processing at the southern border for a a limited group of people believed to have committed serious crimes or who have terrorist links and ultimately more quickly eject them from the country.
The change comes as the administration has been struggling to demonstrate to voters during an election where immigration is a key issue that it has a handle on the southern border. Republicans have consistently slammed the Biden administration over policies that they say have worsened problems at the southern border.
In a statement announcing the changes, the Department of Homeland Security said migrants who are deemed to pose a public threat are taken into custody but a determination on whether they’re eligible for asylum isn’t made until later in the asylum process. Under the proposed rule, asylum officers hearing cases at an initial screening stage called credible fear screening — that’s intended to happen just days after a person arrives in the country will now be able to consider that criminal history or terrorist links when deciding whether someone should ultimately be removed from the country.
“This will allow DHS to expeditiously remove individuals who pose a threat to the United States much sooner than is currently the case, better safeguarding the security of our border and our country,” the department said in the statement.
Under current law, certain mandatory bars make people ineligible for asylum, for example, if you’ve been convicted of a particularly serious crime. But those usually come into play when an immigration judge is making a final determination on whether someone gets asylum and that process can take years. Migrants are usually detained during this time, the department said.
When the rule is in place asylum officers can consider evidence of terrorism links for example and use that as a basis for a denial.
The agency gave no figures on how many people would be affected but said it was small.
Republicans immediately criticized the changes as too little. In a statement, House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Mark E. Green, a Republican from Tennessee called it an “unserious, politically motivated attempt to address a significant problem the Biden administration itself created.”
Separately from the rule announced Thursday, the administration is weighing larger executive action to crack down on immigration at the border. But the timing on when that might be announced depends in large part on whether the number of illegal border crossings increases. After hitting a record high in December, they have decreased in recent months in large part due to Mexican government enforcement.
Under U.S. and international law, anyone who comes to the U.S. can ask for asylum. People from all over the world travel to the U.S-Mexico border to seek that protection. To be granted asylum they must prove persecution or fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
It’s a high bar and the majority of people who apply for asylum ultimately don’t qualify. But the process can take years in overloaded immigration courts.
Critics have questioned whether the asylum system should be fundamentally changed to make it more restrictive while others say the U.S. has a moral obligation to protect people fleeing for their lives.
Last year the administration announced another rule aimed at restricting the asylum process but in much more expansive ways than the one announced Thursday. That rule made it extremely difficult for migrants who come directly to the southern border to get asylum unless they use a government app to make an appointment or they have already tried to seek protection in a country they passed through on their way to the U.S.
Opponents said it’s essentially a rehash of similar efforts by former President Donald Trump and sued. The Biden administration says there are substantial differences between their rule and what Trump tried. That rule is still in place while the issue plays out in court.
Generally, immigration advocates have been hesitant of any steps that would seek to make the initial, credible fear screening harder. They say that migrants are often doing these interviews immediately after surviving life-threatening perilous trips to the U.S. and that these initial credible fear screenings are designed to have a lower bar than final asylum determinations so that people aren’t wrongfully removed.
Gregory Chen, the director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the rules barring people with criminal or terrorist backgrounds from asylum are important to protect the country. But his concern is that these changes will speed up what is already a “highly complex” legal analysis.
“At that early stage, few asylum seekers will have the opportunity to seek legal counsel or time to understand the consequences,” he said. “Under the current process they have more time to seek legal advice, to prepare their case, and to appeal it or seek an exemption.”
veryGood! (1258)
Related
- PHOTO COLLECTION: AP Top Photos of the Day Wednesday August 7, 2024
- When is Passover 2024? What you need to know about the Jewish holiday
- Checkbook please: Disparity in MLB payrolls grows after Dodgers' billion-dollar winter
- 2024 NHL playoffs: Bracket, updated standings, latest playoff picture and more
- Hidden Home Gems From Kohl's That Will Give Your Space a Stylish Refresh for Less
- Barcelona's Sagrada Familia church expected to be completed in 2026
- Women’s March Madness highlights: Texas' suffocating defense overwhelms Gonzaga
- Convicted ex-New Orleans mayor has done his time. Now, can he get the right to carry a gun?
- British swimmer Adam Peaty: There are worms in the food at Paris Olympic Village
- Can 'villain' Colorado Buffaloes overcome Caitlin Clark, Iowa (and the refs)?
Ranking
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Powell says Fed wants to see ‘more good inflation readings’ before it can cut rates
- ACLU, Planned Parenthood challenge Ohio abortion restrictions after voter referendum
- Volunteers uncover fate of thousands of Lost Alaskans sent to Oregon mental hospital a century ago
- The Daily Money: Disney+ wants your dollars
- Duke knocks off No. 1 seed Houston to set up all-ACC Elite Eight in South Region
- Self-Care Essentials to Help You Recover & Get Back on Track After Spring Break
- A man suspected of holding 4 hostages for hours in a Dutch nightclub has been arrested
Recommendation
Bet365 ordered to refund $519K to customers who it paid less than they were entitled on sports bets
'Princess Peach: Showtime!': Stylish, fun Nintendo game lets Peach sparkle in spotlight
Some state lawmakers want school chaplains as part of a ‘rescue mission’ for public education
Can 'villain' Colorado Buffaloes overcome Caitlin Clark, Iowa (and the refs)?
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
Snow-covered bodies of 2 men from Senegal found in New York woods near Canadian border
Unsung North Dakota State transfer leads Alabama past North Carolina and into the Elite 8
LSU star and Baltimore native Angel Reese on bridge collapse: 'I'm praying for Baltimore'