Current:Home > FinanceUS Republican attorneys general sue to stop EPA's carbon rule -Capitatum
US Republican attorneys general sue to stop EPA's carbon rule
SafeX Pro View
Date:2025-04-06 06:43:38
Republican attorneys general from 27 U.S. states and industry trade groups sued the Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday, seeking to block a landmark rule requiring sweeping reductions in carbon emissions from existing coal-fired power plants and new natural gas plants.
The rule, finalized by President Joe Biden's administration last month as part of an effort to combat climate change, was challenged in multiple lawsuits filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, including one by 25 states spearheaded by West Virginia and Indiana and another by Ohio and Kansas. Electric utility, mining and coal industry trade groups also filed lawsuits.
The rule mandates that many new gas and existing coal plants reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2032. The requirements are expected to force the U.S. power industry to install billions of dollars' worth of emissions control technologies or shut down the dirtiest facilities running on coal.
The regulations are part of Biden’s broader climate agenda and target a sector that is responsible for nearly a quarter of the country's greenhouse gas pollution.
The EPA declined to comment.
West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said in a statement that the regulations are based on emissions reduction technologies that have not been meaningfully deployed in the real world, exceed the EPA's authority under the Clean Air Act, and would radically transform the nation’s energy grid without explicit congressional permission to do so.
He said the rule "is setting up the plants to fail and therefore shutter, altering the nation’s already stretched grid."
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association CEO Jim Matheson, whose organization represents nearly 900 local electric cooperatives and filed a lawsuit Thursday, said in a statement that the rule "is unlawful, unreasonable and unachievable."
The lawsuit came a day after 23 Republican attorneys general from states including West Virginia, North Dakota and Texas challenged a different EPA rule that limits the amount of mercury and other hazardous pollutants that can be emitted from power plants.
Legal experts say the EPA's assertion that the emissions reductions are feasible if power plants install carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies - which capture emissions before they are released into the atmosphere - is likely to be a major issue in the litigation.
The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set standards that are attainable using technologies that are “adequately demonstrated.” But while the EPA said it believes CCS is viable and cost-effective, opponents say the technology is not ready to be deployed at power plants across the country.
CCS has been installed at dozens of facilities that process various fuels, but just four coal-fired power globally have CCS installed, according to the Global CCS Institute.
“They’ve taken a pretty aggressive view of what it means to have something be adequately demonstrated, and I just think the Supreme Court will look at this and say EPA is out over its skis,” said Jeff Holmstead, a lawyer at the law firm Bracewell and a former EPA official during the administration of Republican former President George W. Bush.
But supporters say billions of dollars in funding in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act will make CCS cost effective, and the Clean Air Act is designed to force technological advances.
“The law was developed to make sure these newer and yet-to-be-deployed technologies are deployed,” said Jay Duffy, a lawyer at the Center for Applied Environmental Law and Policy.
(Reporting by Clark Mindock, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Christina Fincher, Michael Erman and Daniel Wallis)
veryGood! (25161)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- A big idea for small farms: How to link agriculture, nutrition and public health
- It’s so cold and snowy in Alaska that fuel oil is thickening and roofs are collapsing
- Wisconsin Supreme Court agrees to hear governor’s lawsuit against GOP-controlled Legislature
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Senate close to unveiling immigration deal and national security bill, Schumer says
- What is wasabi and why does it have such a spicy kick?
- Senate close to unveiling immigration deal and national security bill, Schumer says
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Target pulls Black History Month product after video points out misidentified icons
Ranking
- How breaking emerged from battles in the burning Bronx to the Paris Olympics stage
- Recently discharged patient shoots, wounds security officer at Kansas City hospital
- Sacramento family man Ray Wright is abducted. A soda cup leads to his kidnappers.
- MAGA says Taylor Swift is Biden plant. But attacking her could cost Trump the election.
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Tesla recalls 2.2 million cars — nearly all of its vehicles sold in the U.S. — over warning light issue
- U.K. bans American XL bully dogs after spate of deadly attacks
- The Daily Money: Cybercriminals at your door?
Recommendation
Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
Tennessee plans only one year of extra federal summer food aid program for kids
Tom Sandoval Sparks Dating Rumors With Model Victoria Lee Robinson
America's oldest living person is turning 116. Her hometown is throwing a birthday bash
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Australian police share video of officers rescuing 3-year-old boy who got stuck in a claw machine
Idaho coroner releases names of the 3 men who were killed when a Boise aircraft hangar collapsed
Boston-area teachers reach tentative contract agreement after 11-day strike